Biological control does not imply paradox

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Biological control does not imply paradox.

Is the classical predator-prey theory inherently pathological? Defenders of the theory are losing ground in the debate. We will demonstrate that detractors' main argument is based on a faulty model, and that the conceptual and predictive bases of the theory are fundamentally sound.

متن کامل

Biological Control Does Not Imply Paradox — A Case Against Ratio-Dependent Models

Is the classical predator-prey theory inherently pathological? Defenders of the theory are losing grounds in the debate. We will demonstrate that the detractors’ argument is based on a faulty model, and the conceptual and predictive bases of the theory are fundamentally sound. Biological control is to introduce natural predators or parasites to ecosystems for pest control. It works when the pes...

متن کامل

The marginalization paradox does not imply inconsistency for improper priors

The marginalization paradox involves a disagreement between two Bayesians who use two different procedures for calculating a posterior in the presence of an improper prior. We show that the argument used to justify the procedure of one of the Bayesians is inapplicable. There is therefore no reason to expect agreement, no paradox, and no evidence that improper priors are inherently inconsistent....

متن کامل

Superintelligence Does Not Imply Benevolence

Asmachines become capable ofmore autonomous and intelligent behavior, will they also display more morally desirable behavior? Earth’s history tends to suggest that increasing intelligence, knowledge, and rationality will result in more cooperative and benevolent behavior. Animals with sophisticated nervous systems track and punish exploitative behavior, while rewarding cooperation. Humans form ...

متن کامل

Count(q) Does Not Imply Count(p)

I solve a conjecture originally studied by M. Ajtai. It states that for different primes q, p the matching principles Count(q) and Count(p) are logically independent. I prove that this indeed is the case. Actually I show that Count(q) implies Count(p) exactly when each prime factor in p also is a factor in q. 1 The logic of elementary counting “She loves me, she loves me not, she loves me,. . ....

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Mathematical Biosciences

سال: 2007

ISSN: 0025-5564

DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2005.03.002